|
Lyceum No 1
named after St. Konarski
Jedrusiów 1, 39-300 Mielec Mielec, 28th March’03
Report of Spring Day Debate
1. The debate for and against Poland integration with the UE
was held in Lyceum No1 in Mielec on 21st March to celebrate
Spring Day in Europe.
2. The organiser of this activity was the European School Club
called “Young Europeans” which has been acting in the school
since October 2001.
3. The club members invited other students from our school
to take part in this debate. Altogether there were about 60
students.
4. The debate was conducted by Mrs Danuta Mirońska, English
teacher, who is a co-ordinator of the club.
5. The debate was the continuation of earlier discussions about
advantages and disadvantages of Poland joining the UE. During
the previous meeting in March, club members chose the most important
criteria for integration with the UE. This covered 14 aspects:
foreign policy, agriculture, education, job opportunities, economy,
social welfare, consumer’s rights, environment protection, funds,
adaptation of Polish law to European standards and so on. Each
of 14 students was to prepare objectively pros and cons of Polish
integration with the UE in this particular area.
6. The debate on 21st March started at 2.30 p.m. with welcoming
all participants and explaining the rules of discussion. Each
of 14 speakers had the alloted time to present arguments for
and against Polish integration with the EU on the basis of the
gathered information. After the first speaker had finished the
presentation, all the participants began a discussion, expressing
their opinions in this matter.
Later, they had to assess all the positive and negative aspects
within the scale from 0 to 10. On the board there was written
for example: technology - for 8 points against 2 points. This
procedure was continued until all the fourteen criteria were
covered.
7. The score of the debate considering all gains and losses
of Poland integration with the UE in various fields was 69 to
72 points. It means that arguments against our joining the EU
slightly outweighed those supporting the accession.
8. Students decided to collect all the unanswered questions
and submit them to central and local Centres of European Information
with a request for detailed information. The doubts arise from
the fact that the Polish version of the Accession Act has not
been yet presented to the public, so people don’t know exactly
what the result of Copenhagen negotiations was. We should also
take into account the fact that it’s the opinion of teenagers
who come from the region of high unemployment, and people living
here have pessimistic outlook on prospects of our country after
integration.
Conclusions:
Although the results show that the Polish are not still convinced
that the integration will be favourable for them, it is however
important that they are not indifferent to European issues and
are looking for the answers to all the doubts they have.
I personally believe that all the doubts will be dispelled soon
because the pre-referendum campaign is to be launched by the
government on 1st April. So, we are ahead of two months of heated
debates.
Prepared by: Danuta Mirońska
|